I was reading a Wall Street Journal column recently about what happens when AI systems claim they’re sentient. I often read with a pen, and one of the notes I wrote in the margin was this: What people often mean by “sentient” is free will. And free will without stakes is an idea beyond us.
Whatever we believe about AI, there's a question founders and CEOs need to answer: As we give AI agents more responsibility inside our companies, who's accountable for what they do?
An agent can perform tasks, make decisions within defined boundaries, and take action on your company’s behalf. But if it takes an action you didn’t anticipate, the agent can’t own the consequences of what happened. Someone inside your company still has to be accountable for the result.
Read more in Who’s Accountable for Your AI Agents?
That’s why I believe every agent should have one accountable human. That person should understand what the agent is there to do, what it can access, where its authority ends, and how to stop or modify it when needed.
As you give AI more responsibility, are you equally clear about who remains accountable?